{"id":1708,"date":"2026-10-12T18:28:51","date_gmt":"2026-10-12T18:28:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/judge-dismisses-ai-overviews-lawsuits\/"},"modified":"2026-10-26T08:35:14","modified_gmt":"2026-10-26T08:35:14","slug":"judge-dismisses-ai-overviews-lawsuits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/judge-dismisses-ai-overviews-lawsuits\/","title":{"rendered":"Judge dismisses lawsuits alleging Google&#8217;s AI Overviews siphon publisher traffic"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Publishers can exclude their webpages from being used for Google&#8217;s AI Overviews, the AI-written answers at the top of many Google searches, while those pages are still listed in traditional search results, after a federal judge dismissed two lawsuits that claimed those summaries pulled readers and revenue away from the sites that produced the content. Judge Amit Mehta dismissed the complaints from Penske Media Corporation and the ed tech company Chegg in a memorandum opinion dated October 1, 2026, finding that neither company showed Google had broken antitrust law. Mehta is the same judge who ruled in 2024 that Google maintains a monopoly in online search services.<\/p>\n<h2>What this means for your shop, clinic or trade site<\/h2>\n<p>The ruling leaves the existing opt-out in place: publishers can exclude webpages from being used for AI Overviews, but they will still be listed in traditional search results. The practical question for a small site is narrower than the antitrust fight itself. It is how visible each of your pages is, in which search feature, and on which device, now that AI Mode and AI Overviews take up more of the results page.<\/p>\n<h2>Why the lawsuits did not clear the legal bar<\/h2>\n<p>Penske Media and Chegg filed last year, accusing Google of abusing its monopoly by making publishers supply content to AI Overviews for free or risk disappearing from search, which they said cut their traffic and advertising revenue. Chegg went further, arguing Google was effectively forcing sites to allow their content to be scraped for AI use or lose search visibility.<\/p>\n<p>Mehta dismissed both. Antitrust claims of this kind, brought under the Sherman Act, needed some form of agreement between Google and the publishers, and the court found none, with the judge finding no communication between the two sides, <a href=\"https:\/\/thetechlantis.com\/news\/google-ai-overviews-chegg-penske-lawsuits-dismissed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">as Press Gazette reported<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Plaintiffs have pleaded only that they have an &#8216;expectation&#8217; that Google will send them search traffic if they make their content available for free,&quot; Mehta wrote in the memorandum opinion. &quot;But an expectation is not an agreement. It is simply how a general search engine works.&quot;<\/p>\n<p>It was the second such case Mehta has rejected this year, <a href=\"https:\/\/thetechlantis.com\/news\/google-ai-overviews-chegg-penske-lawsuits-dismissed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">according to reporting on the ruling<\/a>. The court was &quot;not unsympathetic to the situation publishers now find themselves in,&quot; but wrote that antitrust rules cannot replace a legislative body&#8217;s decision to address the economic impact of &quot;new innovation,&quot; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/tech\/1003589\/google-ai-overviews-chegg-penske-lawsuits-dismissed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Verge reported<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Penske, which publishes Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, Rolling Stone and Billboard, said its search impressions and referrals dropped after AI Overviews rolled out, and that its organic affiliate revenue fell by more than a third from its peak to the end of 2024, according to Press Gazette. The company also said it could not block Google from using its content in AI Overviews while still showing up normally in search.<\/p>\n<h2>What the ruling means for your pages in AI search<\/h2>\n<p>The decision gives publishers no new power over AI Overviews, and it leaves the existing opt-out in place. You can keep a page in ordinary web search while removing it from the material that feeds the AI summary. With more and more of the search results page taken up by AI Mode and AI Overviews, that might not be a satisfying compromise.<\/p>\n<p>Knowing how a page shows up across these surfaces is the part a small business can measure. <a href=\"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/ai-visibility-get-brand-cited-by-chatgpt-perplexity-google-ai\/\">Our guide to AI visibility<\/a> walks through getting a brand cited by AI answers. BizScoreAI scores how visible a business is to AI search and shows what its listing looks like to the engines people ask.<\/p>\n<h3>What a local business can actually control<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Decide whether you want certain pages kept out of AI Overviews while they stay in traditional search results, which publishers can do according to the reporting.<\/li>\n<li>Ask whoever manages your site or SEO where the AI Overviews opt-out setting lives and whether it is already applied.<\/li>\n<li>Review how your pages appear across search results.<\/li>\n<li>Keep your Google Business Profile accurate.<\/li>\n<li>Follow Google&#8217;s own published guidance on these controls rather than third-party workarounds.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>The bigger picture for AI and antitrust in search<\/h2>\n<p>Mehta&#8217;s 2024 finding that Google operates as a monopolist in online search still stands. This ruling shows that being labeled a monopolist does not turn every disputed practice into an antitrust violation. Each claim still has to meet the legal tests, and these two did not on the facts presented. The publishers had argued that in a competitive market Google would pay them to republish their work or to train its AI, Reuters reported via The Globe and Mail; Google said it has no obligation to index content on a publisher&#8217;s preferred terms and denied wrongdoing.<\/p>\n<p>Other venues are testing related questions. Separately, The Information reported that Google is paying around 100 publishers for their contributions to AI Overviews, AI Mode and Gemini in a pilot program, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/tech\/1003589\/google-ai-overviews-chegg-penske-lawsuits-dismissed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Verge<\/a>. Traffic to news outlets and small websites has dropped sharply as these AI search features expand, The Verge reported.<\/p>\n<h2>What to do now<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li>List your highest-value pages and search the queries that matter to you to see which ones trigger an AI Overview.<\/li>\n<li>Decide, page by page, whether staying in the AI summary or opting out serves you better, then have your site manager apply that choice.<\/li>\n<li>Keep an eye on where your website traffic comes from.<\/li>\n<li>Keep your Google Business Profile and directory listings accurate and consistent.<\/li>\n<li>Watch for Google&#8217;s publisher payment pilot and any policy changes, since the court said the economic impact is a matter for lawmakers, not antitrust.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>FAQ<\/h2>\n<h3>What did the judge decide about Google&#8217;s AI Overviews?<\/h3>\n<p>A federal judge dismissed lawsuits from Penske Media Corporation and Chegg that claimed Google&#8217;s AI Overviews illegally siphoned traffic. The ruling found the publishers did not show that Google was using a search monopoly to force them to provide free material for AI features.<\/p>\n<h3>Can publishers stop their content from appearing in AI Overviews?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes. Publishers can exclude specific webpages from being used for AI Overviews while keeping those pages visible in standard search results. The trade-off is that the AI summary box continues to occupy space at the top of the results page.<\/p>\n<h3>Is Google still considered a monopoly in search after this ruling?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes. Judge Mehta ruled in 2024 that Google maintained a monopoly in online search services. The October 2026 decision only addressed whether the conduct in these two lawsuits crossed the line into an antitrust violation.<\/p>\n<h2>BizScoreAI<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bizscoreai.com\/add-listing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" data-src=\"https:\/\/bizscoreai.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/BizScoreAI-Social-image.jpg\" alt=\"BizScoreAI, which includes the free listing check\" src=\"data:image\/svg+xml;base64,PHN2ZyB3aWR0aD0iMSIgaGVpZ2h0PSIxIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcvMjAwMC9zdmciPjwvc3ZnPg==\" class=\"lazyload\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>BizScoreAI scores how visible a business is to AI search and shows what its listing looks like to the engines people ask. <a href=\"https:\/\/bizscoreai.com\/add-listing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Open the free listing check<\/a>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"source-disclaimer\"><em>This article reports on publicly available information from the sources listed below. We have no reason to believe it is inaccurate, but we have not independently verified every claim, and details may change as the story develops. This is not financial, legal or investment advice.<\/em><\/div>\n<section class=\"post-sources\">\n<h2>Sources<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.engadget.com\/2275023\/judge-dismisses-lawsuits-claiming-googles-ai-overviews-siphon-web-traffic\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Judge dismisses lawsuits claiming Google&#8217;s AI Overviews siphon web traffic, engadget.com, Oct 1, 2026<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theverge.com\/tech\/1003589\/google-ai-overviews-chegg-penske-lawsuits-dismissed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">Judge dismisses antitrust lawsuits over Google\u2019s AI Overviews, theverge.com, Oct 1, 2026<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cryovex.com\/google-ai-overviews-lawsuit-judge-dismisses-antitrust-lawsuits\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">cryovex.com<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/thetechlantis.com\/news\/google-ai-overviews-chegg-penske-lawsuits-dismissed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener nofollow\">thetechlantis.com<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>\n<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What did the judge decide about Google's AI Overviews?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"A federal judge dismissed lawsuits from Penske Media Corporation and Chegg that claimed Google's AI Overviews illegally siphoned traffic. The ruling found the publishers did not show that Google was using a search monopoly to force them to provide free material for AI features.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Can publishers stop their content from appearing in AI Overviews?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes. Publishers can exclude specific webpages from being used for AI Overviews while keeping those pages visible in standard search results. The trade-off is that the AI summary box continues to occupy space at the top of the results page.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Is Google still considered a monopoly in search after this ruling?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Yes. Judge Mehta ruled in 2024 that Google maintained a monopoly in online search services. The October 2026 decision only addressed whether the conduct in these two lawsuits crossed the line into an antitrust violation.\"}}]}]}<\/script><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A federal judge dismissed Penske Media and Chegg lawsuits claiming Google&#8217;s AI Overviews siphon publisher traffic, leaving the existing opt-out intact.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":1707,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"rank_math_title":"Judge dismisses Google AI Overviews lawsuits","rank_math_description":"A judge dismissed Penske Media and Chegg antitrust suits over Google's AI Overviews. What it means for a local site's search visibility.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"ai overviews","rank_math_robots":"","rank_math_canonical_url":"","rank_math_og_title":"","rank_math_og_description":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1708","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ai-news"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1708","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1708"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1708\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1849,"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1708\/revisions\/1849"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1707"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1708"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1708"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/localseobot.ai\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1708"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}